In Chicago, the Sun-Times reported that the Service Employees Internation Union charged that Advocate Health Care, a not-for-profit hospital system, spends more on capital improvements on hospitals in predominantly white areas than it does on hospitals in areas with larger minority populations. The Union asserted that Advocate is not fulfilling its social mission, and thus questioned whether Advocate should keep its not-for-profit status. The state legislature may investigate. Advocate responded by saying its per-patient spending is higher in areas with larger minority populations.
Yet another case raising questions about whether a not-for-profit health care system is true to its mission....
Home
»
Advocate Health Care
»
hospitals
» Union Charges Advocate Health Care Skimps on Capital Improvements in Minority Areas
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét