A review in the 4 December BMJ (BMJ 2004;329:1317) finds that when we get right down to it, NSAIDs (both traditional and COX-2's) have minimal effect over and above placebo for osteoarthritic pain. Aside from being humbling (but not overly surprising, really), it caused me to think about the role of hope and expectation in health care and also the role of alternative medicine.
As others have recently pointed out on this blog, all the pain meds can be bad for us. As it now seems, they aren't particularly good for us either, leaving one to wonder whether the balance does in fact lie on the positive side of the scale. Perhaps the answer is to be a bit less rosy-eyed in our own tendency to overestimate the benefits and underestimate the risks of what we prescribe, and to inform patients honestly about the magnitude of benefit and risk so they can make their own decisions. (That's really what got Merck into trouble over Vioxx: not that it caused harm, but that they knew it and concealed it while simultaneously inflating claims of benefit.) But then if we tell patients "this stuff can eat your stomach, might give you a heart attack, and doesn't really do any more for your knee than those M&M's over there", how will patients respond? People come to us for doctoring, not just technology. The pills we prescribe represent hope: the doctor prescribed them, and they are powerful "medicine" (in the sense that my Chippewa ancestors meant it, not in the sense pharmacists mean it).
If we're addressing people's strongly felt (and I believe absolutely legitimate) need for doctoring by prescribing something that can hurt them, costs a lot, and doesn't really do much, and we're not leveling with them about that, are we committing the quackery we accuse alternative providers of? Hmm. I'm not about to start defending the nutbars of pseudoscience, but if we're scientific we have to apply our standards ourselves too, eh?
I recommend glucosamine a lot lately. It doesn't work any less well than NSAIDs or COX-2s, it doesn't plug arteries or eat gastric mucosa, and it's pretty cheap. At bottom, I have to respect what the patient came to me for. If it's almost a placebo... let's not knock 'em, just pick safe ones.
Home
»
»Unlabelled
» Drugs, risks, benefits, and honesty
Recent Posts
There They Go Again - Merck Threatened Legal Action Against Italian Doctor who Criticized Zetia
08 Jul 20140It seems that when confronted with unfavorable facts or opinions, Merck executives like to threaten ...Read more »
What Does the Blumsohn - Procter and Gamble -Sheffield University Affair Say About the Fitness of the Latest VA Secretary Candidate?
02 Jul 20140Introduction - New Leadership for the US Department of Veterans Affairs After reports of problems wi...Read more »
Health Care Corruption, "No Dirty Little Secret," but "An Open Sore" - Lessons from India for the US
01 Jul 20140Health care corruption is widely prevalent around the globe, but remains the great unmentionable.Int...Read more »
Through a Glass Darkly - How Can So Many Health Care Executives Be Visionaries?
26 Jun 20140Visionary (noun) 1: one whose ideas or projects are impractical : dreamer 2: one w...Read more »
A Real Example of Public Relations Talking Points to Justify Outsize Executive Compensation - and Why We Should No Longer be Fooled
25 Jun 20140We frequently discuss outsize executive compensation in health care organizations as both a symptom ...Read more »
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.