Despite Poor Financial Results, Diminishing Pipeline, Multiple Settlements of Legal Cases, Outgoing Pfizer CEO Got Over $24 Million

It is the season for share-holders' meetings of big US publicly held corporations, and as the proxy statements prepared for these meetings, prepare for more eye-popping, jaw-dropping examples of executive compensation.  <br /><br /><strong>Pfizer's 2010 CEO Compensation</strong><br />The AP (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/AP710553746b304ba0b503426028084ebd.html">via the Wall Street Journal</a>) just noted the compensation given to Jeffrey Kindler, the outgoing (in 2010) CEO of Pfizer, Inc, the world's largest pharmaceutical company:<br /><br /><blockquote>Former Pfizer Inc. Chairman and CEO Jeffrey B. Kindler may have left the world's largest drugmaker abruptly last December, <em>but he didn't leave empty-handed thanks to a compensation package valued almost <strong>$22 million</strong>.</em><br /><br /><em>Kindler received a 60 percent increase last year over his 2009 compensation</em>, according to an Associated Press analysis of a Pfizer regulatory filing Tuesday.<br /><br />The New York-based drugmaker gave Kindler a salary and performance-related bonus totaling $4.9 million, a $4.5 million severance payment and more than $12 million in stock and option awards. The company also will continue his health coverage for 12 months 'at active employee rates,' the filing said.</blockquote><br />In fact, perusal of the new <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/files/annualreport/2010/proxy/proxyfinancial2010.pdf">2011 Pfizer proxy statement</a> shows that Kindler, who stepped down on 5 December, 2010, made even more based on Pfizer's own calculations, <em><strong>$24,688, 849</strong></em>. Curiously, Ian Read, the CEO after 5 December, and previously Group President, Worldwide Pharmaceutical Business, received <em><strong>$17,396,112</strong></em>, despite only being CEO for 26 days.<br /><br /><strong>Pay for What Kind of Performance?</strong><br /><br />These opulent pay packages stand in contrast to Pfizer's performance under Kindler and its financial results in 2010:<br /><blockquote>Kindler was ousted by Pfizer's board unexpectedly Dec. 6 after <em>four years of languishing share prices and several failures of promising drugs in late testing,</em> including a successor to cholesterol fighter Lipitor, the world's top-selling drug. Pfizer will lose U.S. patent protection in November for Lipitor.</blockquote><br />Also,<br /><blockquote><em>Pfizer's 2010 net income fell 4 percent to $8.26 billion</em>, or $1.02 per share. Revenue totaled $67.81 billion, up 36 percent, thanks to $18.1 billion from sales of Wyeth products.<br /><br /><em>Its stock price slipped 4 percent to</em> close 2010 at $17.31, while the Standard & Poor's 500 index climbed 12.8 percent.</blockquote><br />Furthermore, the compensation given the former and current CEO also stood in sharp contrast to Pfizer's amazing track record of recent unethical behavior.   Pfizer paid a $2.3 billion settlement in 2009 of civil and criminal allegations and a Pfizer subsidiary entered a guilty plea to charges it violated federal law regarding its marketing of Bextra (see post <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2009/09/pfour-legal-settlements-for-pfizer-why.html">here</a>).  Pfizer was involved in three other major cases from then to early 2010, including two involving settlements of fraud charges, and one in which a jury found the company guilty of violating the RICO (racketeer-influenced corrupt organization) statute (see post <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/03/settlement-and-conviction-round-up.html">here</a>).  The company was listed as one of the pharmaceutical "big four" companies in terms of defrauding the government (see post <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/12/drug-companies-are-now-no-1-when-it.html">here</a>).  Pfizer's Pharmacia subsidiary settled allegations that it inflated drugs costs paid by New York in early 2011 (see post <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/02/pharmacia-or-maybe-pfizer-settles-only.html">here</a>).   Just yesterday a settlement was announced in a long-running class action case which involved allegations that another Pfizer subsidiary had exposed many people to asbestos (see <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-22/pfizer-reaches-asbestos-settlement-that-may-end-quigley-unit-s-bankruptcy.html">this story</a> in Bloomberg).<br /><br />Despite Pfizer's recent dismal financial performance, clotted drug pipeline, and unfortunate ethical/ legal track record, the company's board compensation committee reported thus:<br /><blockquote>The Committee believes that <em>Pfizer’s executive compensation program implements and achieves the goals of our executive compensation philosophy</em>. Pfizer’s executive compensation philosophy, which is set by the Committee, is <em>to align each executive’s compensation with Pfizer’s short-term and long-term performance</em> and to provide the compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate and retain key executives who are crucial to Pfizer’s long-term success.</blockquote><strong>Who Provided "Stewardship" of Pfizer?</strong><br />So I had to ask: who were these people who thought that compensation of over $24 million was somehow "aligned" with declining profits, declining revenues, little output of new drugs, and multiple legal settlements of charges like fraud and violating the RICO act? <br /><br />Here is a list of Pfizer's board of directors in 2010, and some relevant affiliations, taken from <a href="http://www.pfizer.com/about/leadership_and_structure/meet_board.jsp">Pfizer's web-site</a>, and where indicated, elsewhere (color coding to be explained below)<br /><br />- <em>Dennis A. Ausiello, M.D</em>. - <br /><span style="color: red;">Jackson Professor of Clinical Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Chief of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital since 1996</span>. <br /><span style="color: orange;">Member of the Institute of Medicine</span>....<br /><span style="color: lime;">Director of TARIS BioMedical, Inc</span>.<br />(<a href="http://www.researchamerica.org/ausiello_dennis">per Research!America bio</a>) <span style="color: lime;">advisor to drug delivery and biosensing start-up companies Entra, BIND Biosciences, and Seventh Sense Biosystems, Inc., to drug-discovery startup companies Promedior and Pulmatrix, to Proventys, an evidence-based medicine delivery system</span>, and to <span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">Ore Pharmaceuticals and Polaris, investment and venture capital companies working in the biotech and device area</span>. <br /><br />- <em>Michael S. Brown, M.D</em>. -<br /><span style="color: red;">Distinguished Chair in Biomedical Sciences since 1989 and Regental Professor since 1985 at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas</span>. <br /><span style="color: orange;">Member of ... the Institute of Medicine</span>,....<br /><span style="color: lime;">Director of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc</span>.<br /><br />-<em> M. Anthony Burns</em> -<br />Chairman Emeritus since 2002, Chairman of the Board from 1985 to 2002, Chief Executive Officer from 1983 to 2000, and President from 1979 to 1999 of Ryder System, Inc., a provider of transportation and logistics services.<br /><span style="color: red;">Life Trustee of the University of Miami</span>. <br /><br />- <em>Robert N. Burt</em> -<br />Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FMC Corporation, a chemicals manufacturer, and FMC Technologies Inc., a machinery manufacturer....<br /><span style="color: red;">Life Trustee of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago</span><br /><br />- <em>W. Don Cornwell</em> -<br />Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Granite Broadcasting Corporation from 1988 until his retirement in August 2009 and Vice Chairman until December 2009.<br />(per <a href="http://www.wallacefoundation.org/AboutUs/directors_and_staff/Pages/BioWDonCornwell.aspx">Wallace Foundation web-site</a>) <span style="color: blue;">He previously served as vice president, investment banking division, of Goldman Sachs.</span><br /><br />- <em>Frances D. Fergusson, Ph.D</em>. -<br />President Emeritus of Vassar College since 2006 and President from 1986 to 2006. <span style="color: red;">Served on the Mayo Clinic Board for 14 years, the last four years as its Chairman, and as President of the Board of Overseers of Harvard University from 2007 through 2008.</span><br /><br />- <em>William H. Gray III</em> -<br />Co-Chairman of GrayLoeffler, LLC (formerly the Amani Group), a business advisory and consulting firm. Chairman of the Amani Group from 2004 through September 2009.<br /><span style="color: blue;">Currently Director of ... J. P. Morgan Chase & Co.</span> <br /><br />- <em>Constance J. Horner</em> -<br />Guest Scholar from 1993 until 2005 at The Brookings Institution....<br /><br />- <em>James M. Kilts</em> -<br /><span style="background-color: #999999;"><span style="color: yellow;"><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">Founding Partner, Centerview Partners Management, LLC, a private equity firm, since 2006</span></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">. </span><br />(Per <a href="http://www.centerviewpartners.com/overview.aspx?xitm=2&yitm=1">Centerview Partners web-site</a>) <span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">Centerview Partners' investment banking advisory business serves some of the largest companies globally in a broad range of industries, with particular expertise in Food & Consumer Products, Financial Institutions, General Industrials, Healthcare, Media & Entertainment .... </span><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">The firm has executed many significant transactions in recent years, including:</span><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">Altria's $113 billion spin-off of Philip Morris International, its $62 billion spin-off of Kraft and its $11.7 billion acquisition of UST...</span><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">Facet Biotech's $722 million sale to Abbott Labs; </span><br /><span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">OSI Pharmaceuticals' $4.0 billion sale to Astellas Pharma</span>;<br /><br />- <em>George A. Lorch</em> -<br />Chairman Emeritus of Armstrong Holdings, Inc., a global manufacturer of flooring and ceiling materials,....<br /><br />- <em>John P. Mascotte -</em><br /><span style="color: magenta;">Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, Inc</span>.,...<br /><br />- <em>Suzanne Nora Johnson</em> -<br /><span style="color: blue;">Retired Vice Chairman, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.,...</span><br /><span style="color: blue;">Director of American International Group, Inc., </span>.... <span style="color: orange;">Board member of the American Red Cross</span>, The Brookings Institution, ... and <span style="color: red;">the University of Southern California</span>. <br />(per <a href="http://www.milkeninstitute.org/events/gcprogram.taf?EventID=GC08&SPID=3058&function=bio">Milken Institute web-site</a>) on the board of numerous not-for-profit organizations, including ... <span style="color: orange;">RAND Health ....</span><br /><span style="color: red;">She is on the Advisory Board of Councilors of Harvard Medical School</span><br /><br />-<em> Ian C. Read</em> -<br />President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2010. <br /><br />- <em>Stephen W. Sanger</em> -<br />Chairman of General Mills, Inc.<br /><span style="color: blue;">Currently Director of ... Wells Fargo & Company.</span><br /><br />- <em>William C. Steere, Jr</em>. -<br />Chairman Emeritus of Pfizer Inc. since 2001.<br /><span style="color: purple;">Currently Director of Health Management Associates, Inc</span>. <br /><span style="color: red;">Director of the New York University Medical Center ...; and Member of the Board of Overseers of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center</span>.<br /><br />Of Pfizer's 14 directors (excluding its CEO), seven have or had <span style="color: red;">leadership positions at teaching hospitals, academic medical centers, medical schools or their parent universities</span>. Three have or had<span style="color: orange;"> leadership positions at other influential non-profit health care organizations. </span><br /><br /><br />Two had <span style="color: lime;">leadership positions at potentially competing pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies</span>.<br /><br />Two had <span style="background-color: white; color: cyan;">leadership positions at companies that finance pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other health related companies.</span><br /><br />One had a <span style="color: magenta;">leadership position at a health insurance company</span>.<br /><br />One had a <span style="color: purple;">leadership position at a for-profit hospital operating company</span>.<br /><br />Four had <span style="color: blue;">leadership positions in financial services corporations</span>, including some that were implicated in the global financial collapse, and/or required massive federal bail-outs to avoid collapse.<br /><br />It seems that every time we look at the boards of directors or trustees who are supposed to provide stewardship to a troubled health care organization, we see a similar pattern.  Just as we <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/despite-recalls-legal-settlements.html">recently said</a> about the Johnson and Johnson board, ....<br />  <br /><strong>Summary</strong> <br />  <br />So here we have the latest striking case that indicates the confluence of forces that can lead to health care dysfunction. Not only has the compensation given to health care leaders got so large that it is per se a cause of increased health spending, but also, and more importantly, such compensation often provides perverse incentives that perpetuate mismanagement, raising costs and lowering quality. This situation appears to be enabled by governance (or "stewardship") by individuals who are often fellow members of the CEOs' club, and hence who may feel more sympathy with the executives they are supposed to supervise than the stockholders whose financial interests they are supposed to protect, or the public whom the companies' products and services are supposed to benefit. Moreover, these individuals often have conflicts of interest which may mitigate against objective scrutiny of the executives they are supposed to oversee. Finally, these individuals often may come from corporate cultures which do not espouse the values that we in health care are supposed to uphold. (See this post and its links for other examples of the sorts of people who are supposed to provide stewardship to health care organizations.) <br /><br /><br />So to repeat once more-<br /><br />I strongly believe that there needs to be much more investigation, academic, journalistic, and perhaps legal, of the identity, nature, and culture of the leaders of health care, and their relationships. A few bloggers cannot do it all. Obviously, the <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/anechoic%20effect">anechoic effect</a> mitigates against medical and health care academics looking into their own leaders. However, failing to understand who is leading our march to the brink of health care failure ought not to be something such academics would want on their conscience.<br /><br />Finally, and obviously, health care organizations need leaders that uphold the core values of health care, and focus on and are accountable for the mission, not on secondary responsibilities that conflict with these values and their mission, and not on self-enrichment. Leaders ought to be rewarded reasonably, but not lavishly, for doing what ultimately improves patient care, or when applicable, good education and good research.<br /><br />If we do not fix the severe problems affecting the leadership and governance of health care, and do not increase accountability, integrity and transparency of health care leadership and governance, we will be as much to blame as the leaders when the system collapses.<br /><br />ADDENDUM (23 March, 2011) - See also <a href="http://gooznews.com/?p=2622">comments</a> by Merrill Goozner on the GoozNews blog.

Despite Poor Financial Results, Diminishing Pipeline, Multiple Settlements of Legal Cases, Outgoing Pfizer CEO Got Over $24 Million

It is the season for share-holders' meetings of big US publicly held corporations, and as the proxy statements prepared for these meetin...

Đọc thêm »

Millions to Health Insurance CEOs, But Blame Everyone Else for Rising Health Care Costs

The revelations about the huge golden parachute given the outgoing CEO of ostensibly non-profit Massachusetts Blue Cross Blue Shield induced some public discussion about the disconnect between executive compensation and the mission of health care organization (see most recent post <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/some-dare-call-it-corruption.html">here</a>).  Several other recent stories should generate more discussion on these issues.  <br /><br />First, new proxy statements revealed the compensation of executives of two large for-profit health care insurers/ managed care companies.  In alphabetical order,<br /><br /><strong>Cigna</strong><br /><br />As reported by the AP, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=13169800">via ABC news</a>, the CEO got a big raise:<br /><blockquote>Cigna Corp. CEO David M. Cordani's total compensation <em>more than doubled in 2010</em>, his first year as leader of the nation's fourth-largest health insurer, and a period in which the company's earnings, revenue and enrollment all climb.<br /><br />Cordani, 45, received <em>compensation valued at <strong>$15.1 million</strong></em> last year from the Philadelphia managed-care company, according to an Associated Press analysis of a regulatory filing Friday.<br /><br />That included a $1 million salary, a performance-related bonus totaling more than $7.3 million and stock and option awards adding up to $6.7 million.</blockquote><br />In 2009, Cordani's compensation was $6.5 million, but he did not serve for the entire year. Note that according to the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/701221/000089322009000604/w73121fdef14a.htm">2009 proxy</a>, the previous CEO, H Edward Hanway, received $12,236,740 in total compensation in 2008, his last year as CEO. <br /><br />What was the rationale for the huge rise in Cordani's compensation from 2009 to 2010? (And implicitly, the fairly large increase compared to Hanway's compensation in his last year?)<br /><blockquote>The company said in its proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that Cigna <em>'effectively executed on its growth strategy under Cordani's leadership</em> last year.<br /><br />'Revenue rose significantly in 2010, reflecting strong premium growth in (Cigna's) ongoing business segments,' the proxy said.<br /><br /><em>Cigna earned about $1.35 billion, or $4.89 per share, on $21.25 billion in revenue in 2010. That was up from $1.3 billion, or $4.73 per share, on $18.41 billion in revenue in 2009</em>. The insurer's medical <em>membership climbed 4 percent</em> to 11.4 million people compared to the final quarter of 2009, when it fell more than 5 percent. That helped raise premiums and fees in health care, the insurer's largest segment.</blockquote><br />Also,<br /><blockquote><em>Cigna shares climbed 4 percent to close 2010</em> at $36.66, while the Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 12.8 percent.</blockquote><br />So to recap, Cigna's current CEO's total compensation doubled in a year while earnings and the stock price rose about 4%. <br /><br /><strong>WellPoint</strong><br /><br />Also reported by AP, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/wellpoint-ceo-compensation-rose-to-134-million-last-year-despite-slide-in-profit/2011/03/18/ABaEq1r_story.html">via the Washington Post</a>, the CEO got a small raise (but ended up with compensation similar to Mr Cordani's above):<br /><blockquote>The president and CEO of health insurer WellPoint Inc. <em>received a 3 percent boost in total compensation in 2010</em> even as the company’s profit and enrollment numbers slipped during a transitional year for U.S. health care companies.<br /><br />The Indianapolis-based insurer awarded Angela Braly a <em>total pay package worth <strong>$13.4 million</strong> up from $13.1 million in 2009. </em>Wellpoint disclosed the compensation — which includes salary, bonus and other awards — in a filing with federal financial regulators late Friday.</blockquote><br />On the other hand, the company did not do so well financially:<br /><blockquote>The insurer’s <em>profit fell sharply last year compared with 2009</em>, when the sale of its NextRx subsidiary contributed $2.2 billion in after-tax income. <em>Medical enrollment also slid 1 percent</em> last year to 33.3 million members.</blockquote><br />So what was the rationale for even a small raise (over an already huge compensation package)?<br /><blockquote>In the company’s filing, Wellpoint’s board of directors highlighted <em>accomplishments by management,</em> including reducing general expenses by 3 percent. </blockquote><br />Also, <br /><blockquote>A Wellpoint spokeswoman stressed Friday that the company’s pay formula rewards executives for improving enrollee health, boosting share prices and meeting other pre-set goals.<br /><br />'For the CEO, almost 90 percent of total target compensation is based on company performance and is tied to meeting established goals,' Kristin Binns said in a statement.</blockquote>So while Cigna did slightly better financially than last year, its CEO's total compensation doubled to well over $10 million, and while WellPoint did slightly worse financially than last year, its CEO's total compensation increased, again remaining well over $10 million.  It seems that the leaders of top health care organizations will continue to get richer, no matter how well their organizations performed financially, let alone what effect they had on patients' and the public's health.<br /><strong>So What Drives Up Health Care Costs?</strong><br /><br />Just to distract from CEOs getting increases in their already huge compensation that seem disproportionate to any reasonable measure of their companies' financial performance, health care insurers continued to deny any responsibility for the rise in health care costs. <br /><br />For example, the San Francisco Chronicle published <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/03/19/MNCE1I3D1T.DTL">a story </a>entitled, "Insurer Wants Focus on What Drives Up Health Costs," which had a familiar ring:<br /><blockquote>When health insurers notify members that rates are going up - often in the punishing double-digits - they typically blame rising medical costs.<br /><br />They say <em>the problem really isn't theirs; it's all the other pieces of the health-care puzzle</em> that drive up costs that must be passed on to customers.</blockquote>Don't blame you, don't blame me, blame that fella behind the tree.<br />It went on to name all the usual suspects (color-coded for comparison below):<br /><blockquote>Insurers say their costs grow in part because of <em><span style="color: red;">new medical technologies</span></em> and the<em> rising price of pharmaceutical products and medical equipment.</em><br /><br /><em><span style="color: orange;">The consolidation of hospitals and doctors</span></em> into large networks also makes it hard to keep prices low, as do <em>waste, fraud and malpractice,</em> they say. The system also <em><span style="color: orange;">lacks incentives for hospitals and doctors to curb costs.</span></em> For example, they can charge twice by repeating tests and procedures, and by readmitting patients.<br /><br />Insurers also say they lose money with policies people buy on their own, as opposed to group coverage from employers. Because the individual policies are more expensive, healthier people tend to avoid them, leaving insurers with a sicker pool.<br /><br />Poor reimbursement from government programs such as Medi-Cal also forces insurers to raise private insurance prices to make up the slack, they say.<br /><br />Finally, as<span style="color: lime;"> </span><em><span style="color: lime;">people get older</span> and fatter</em>, they gobble up more health care resources.<br /><br />'When you're looking at growth in premiums, the largest engine of that growth are those medical costs,' said Charles Bacchi, executive vice president of the California Association of Health Plans, which represents health insurers. He said <em>critics who claim that insurers raise prices to increase profits and pad executive salaries are wrong</em>, and that insurers' average profit margin has remained at 3 to 5 percent for years.</blockquote><br />First, note that the executive compensation, the administrative costs, the marketing, public relations and lobbying costs all come off the top of revenues before any profits are generated, and before any possible dividends get paid to stock-holders.   I suspect that the insurance industry spokespeople immediately switch the topic to profits and investors' results to distract from those who really make money from health insurance companies, the top executives, and all those managers, bureaucrats, marketers, public relations people, and lobbyists who never touch patients and never deliver any care.  As Wendell Potter has written, many people like to blame government bureaucrats for health care's problems. They may deserve some blame, but not any more, and perhaps less than corporate bureaucrats and executives.<br /><br />Recall further what Wendell Potter described in <em><a href="http://wendellpotter.com/deadlyspin/">Deadly Spin</a></em>. All those health insurance corporate public relations people were earning good salaries in part based on their ability to distract the public and policy-makers from the insurance companies' roles in health care dysfunction. Potter wrote (p. 110):<br /><blockquote>Rather than admit responsibility for the failures, insurance executives pointed the finger of blame at their customers, the 'consumers' of health care, and, of course, the providers of care. In introducing the concept of their new silver bullet - consumer driven health care - insurance executives claimed that the 'real drivers of health care costs' (one of my CEO's favorite expressions) were the people who sought care when they really didn't need it and the <em><span style="color: orange;">doctors and hospitals who were all too willing to provide this unnecessary care</span>.</em> Sure, the <em><span style="color: lime;">aging population</span></em> and <em><span style="color: red;">expensive new technology</span></em> were also factors, but the main culprits were people who just didn't realize how expensive health care had become.</blockquote><br />Note the similarities among the "real drivers of health care costs" promulgated by the corporate PR people and the defense of the health insurers' role mounted above (some of the more obvious color-coded). Note that the defenses never explain why the insurance companies seem unable to negotiate prices down, and why they all use the physician payment schedule derived from the recommendations of the secretive <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/RUC">RUC</a>.<br /><br />For some final irony, the Chronicle found an academic who was not too hard on the health insurance companies:<br /><blockquote>Glenn Melnick, a health economist at the University of Southern California, <em>sympathizes with many of the insurers' arguments.</em><br /><br />He blamed rising costs mainly on <span style="color: orange;"><em>higher prices charged by hospitals and doctors</em></span>, which account for the largest portion of health care spending.</blockquote><br />The reporter did not note Prof Melnick's full title, <a href="http://www.usc.edu/schools/sppd/faculty/detail.php?id=21">Professor and <em>Blue Cross of California Chair</em> in Health Care Finance</a>. Oops.<br /><br />So in summary, health care costs continue rising, access keeps declining, and there is no evidence of improvements in quality. Large health care organizations blame each other for the problems, but nearly all of them continue to make their top executives extremely rich. Although the amounts diverted to these executives cannot solely account for the rise in health care costs, the perverse incentives given those who lead health care are likely a major cause of the problems. A health care system run by leaders who are comfortable becoming extremely rich while the health care crisis worsens is a likely recipe for dysfunction.<br /><br />We now know commercial health insurers deploy well paid public relations departments to use stealthy if not downright deceptive means to distract those who want to address what really causes health care dysfunction (see <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/02/wendell-potters-deadly-spin.html">this post</a>.) It is likely that all large health care organizations use similar stealth advocacy strategies. These strategies have successfully distracted the conversation away from problems with health care leadership and governance, at least until now. <br /><br />As we have <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/executive%20compensation">said before</a>, far too often the leaders of not-for-profit health care institutions seem more interested in padding their own bottom lines than upholding the institutions' missions. They often seem entirely unaware of their duty to put those missions ahead of their own self-interest. Like the financial services sector in the era of "greed is good," health care too often seems run by <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2009/12/compensation-madness-insiders-hijacking.html">"<strong><em>insiders hijacking established institutions for their personal benefit.</em></strong>"</a> True health care reform would encourage leadership of health care who understand health care and care about its mission, rather than those who see a quick way to make a small fortune. <br /><br />Furthermore, we need an open discussion of the real issues related to health care dysfunction, not one stifled by the anechoic effect, spun by corporate PR, and dominated by "third parties" whose conflicts of interest are hidden. 

Millions to Health Insurance CEOs, But Blame Everyone Else for Rising Health Care Costs

The revelations about the huge golden parachute given the outgoing CEO of ostensibly non-profit Massachusetts Blue Cross Blue Shield induced...

Đọc thêm »

How Academic and Government "Anecdotes Are Not Data" Ideologues Kill People

<span style="font-family:arial;">I'm already receiving comments that, regarding Prof. Jon Patrick's <a href="http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/it/%7Ehitru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=120&Itemid=116">detailed exposé of the dangers of ill-suited-for-purpose ED EHR's</a>, Patrick's observations are:</span><br /><br /><blockquote style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">... not really valid because they're not peer reviewed; they're just anecdotal. </span><br /></blockquote><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Only an egghead could pen such words.</span><br /><br /><div style="font-family: arial; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnm-VeDoSTOA0VFdXBJX1y4Hq8pyCu-Tdm0vp3ZLcnb9DtRWE04U4A6roR74FqyefhpAs64e6m1Y1Ocu48BU5nS9CfQ6F-yD9M_OLUguFELqMVXZDWL5mUM2Y4mz-owegR86ENRfQJEsN1/s1600/egghead.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5586993306053914498" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnm-VeDoSTOA0VFdXBJX1y4Hq8pyCu-Tdm0vp3ZLcnb9DtRWE04U4A6roR74FqyefhpAs64e6m1Y1Ocu48BU5nS9CfQ6F-yD9M_OLUguFELqMVXZDWL5mUM2Y4mz-owegR86ENRfQJEsN1/s320/egghead.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; width: 134px; cursor: pointer; height: 121px; text-align: center;" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">I always get hives immediately after eating strawberries. But without a scientifically controlled experiment with all the right peer review, it's not reliable data. So I continue to eat strawberries every day, since I can't tell if they cause hives.</span><br /></span></div><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br />I'd already written about <span style="font-weight: bold;">anecdotalist </span></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">refrains</span> </span><span style="font-family:arial;">at my Mar. 7, 2011 post "</span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/australian-ed-ehr-study-putting-lie-to.html">Australian ED EHR Study: Putting the Lie to the Line "Your Evidence Is Anecdotal, Thus Worthless" Used by Eggheads, Fools and Gonifs.</a><span style="font-family:arial;">" In that essay I cite Dr. Patrick himself on "anecdotal evidence", regarding which he hit the ball out of the Southern Hemisphere </span><span style="font-family:arial;">in an editorial in "</span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://aci.schattauer.de/en/contents/archive/issue/1124/manuscript/15463/show.html">Applied Clinical Informatics</a><span style="font-family:arial;">"</span><span style="font-family:arial;"> entitled </span><span style="font-family:arial;">"</span><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:arial;" >The Validity of Personal Experiences in Evaluating HIT</span><span style="font-family:arial;">." </span><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /><span style="font-size:100%;">Aside from the fact that eggheads also don't seem to care about the issues of faulty peer review, especially in profitable biomedical sectors, such as at "</span></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/12/lancet-emphasizes-threats-to-academic.html">The Lancet Emphasizes the Threats to the Academic Medical Mission</a></span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" >" with its embedded links, and "</span><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2009/08/has-ghostwriting-infected-experts-with.html">Has Ghostwriting Infected The Experts With Tainted Knowledge, Creating Vectors for Further Spread and Mutation of the Scientific Knowledge Base?</a>"</span><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:100%;">, there's this simple fact:</span><br /><br /></span><strong style="font-family:arial;"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);font-size:130%;" ><blockquote>Public health catastrophe warnings from responsible sources don't need peer review, they need <span style="font-style: italic;">investigation</span>.</blockquote></span></strong><span style=";font-family:arial;font-size:100%;" ><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><br />Yes, there were those pesky, off-narrative journalistic reports that the Japanese nuclear reactors were not entirely safe, that Bernie Madoff was a fraud, that mortgages for everyone was not a good idea, that the O-rings couldn't stand sub-freezing temperatures, that the the foam that broke off the Columbia launch tank caused a danger, and that the Titanic didn't have enough lifeboats, but they weren't peer reviewed...so we ignored them. Saved us a lot of money, too.</span></strong></span><br /><div style="text-align: center; font-family: arial;"><strong></strong></div><strong style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><br />-- SS<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Addendum:</span><br /><br />At my post <span style="text-decoration: underline;">"</span></span></strong><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/real-medical-informatics-what-does.html">Real" Medical Informatics: What Does a Problem List of Typical Health IT Look Like, Part 2</a><span style="font-family:arial;">", I opined:</span><br /><br /><blockquote style="font-family:arial;">If the purpose of Medical Informatics is the <span style="font-style: italic;">improvement of healthcare</span> (as opposed to career advancement of a small number of academics through publishing obscure articles about HIT benefits while ignoring downsides in rarified, echo-chamber peer reviewed journals), then:<br /><br /><ul><li>Who are the <span style="font-weight: bold;">"real" medical informatics specialists</span>, and;<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Who are the <span style="font-weight: bold;">poseurs</span>?</li></ul><br />... researchers like Jon Patrick who address real-world issues of great import to patients on HIT risks, and further go public on the web with their work without the full blessings of some dusty journal (and those like Ross Koppel who also directly address the downsides, and others who make available to the public material such as on blogs like <a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/">this</a> and <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/">this</a>, papers <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/28747771/Remediating-an-Unintended-Consequence-of-Healthcare-IT-A-Dearth-of-Data-on-Unintended-Consequences-of-Healthcare-IT">like this</a> and sites <a href="http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/ssilverstein/cases/">like this</a>) are the <span style="font-style: italic;">former</span>.<br /><br />Those who deem only "peer reviewed" articles worthy of daylight, and everything else - <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">especially</span> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">and particularly </span>reports of downsides - "anecdotal" (the <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/09/dangers-of-critical-thinking-in.html">anecdotalists</a>) are the <span style="font-style: italic;">latter</span>.</blockquote><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">I stand by this assertion.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Finally, I ask: at what point does ignoring work such as Prof. Patrick's, if patient harm is caused by the system he reviewed, constitute reckless endangerment and perhaps </span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence">criminal negligence</a> by hospital and government officials?<br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">-- SS</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:arial;" >Addendum</span><span style="font-family:arial;"> Mar. 23:</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">As if on cue, this story appeared in the WSJ:</span><br /><blockquote style="font-family: arial;"><br />March 23, 2011<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703410604576216481092750122.html">Japan Ignored Warning of Nuclear Vulnerability </a><br /><br />TOKYO—Japanese regulators discussed in recent months the use of new cooling technologies at nuclear plants that could have lessened or prevented the disaster that struck this month when a tsunami wiped out the electricity at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi power facility.<br /><br />However, they<span style="font-weight: bold;"> chose to ignore the vulnerability at existing reactors </span>and instead focused on fixing the issue in future ones, government and corporate documents show. There was no serious discussion of retrofitting older plants with the alternative technology</blockquote><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">I guess the "vulnerability reports" just weren't peer reviewed, therefore meaningless - or not reviewed by the "right" peers.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">This sounds like our own FDA, ONC office and Institute of Medicine (via the </span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/committee-on-patient-safety-and-health.html">Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology</a><span style="font-family:arial;">), "choosing to ignore" health IT "vulnerabilities" (such as the </span><a style="font-family: arial;" href="http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/it/%7Ehitru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=120&Itemid=116">aforementioned</a><span style="font-family:arial;">) and focusing on future issues such as comparative effectiveness research, "the common good", etc. instead.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">I call this attitude "reckless endangerment" and hope plaintiff attorneys are paying close attention.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">-- SS</span>

How Academic and Government "Anecdotes Are Not Data" Ideologues Kill People

I'm already receiving comments that, regarding Prof. Jon Patrick's detailed exposé of the dangers of ill-suited-for-purpose ED EHR...

Đọc thêm »

"Real" Medical Informatics: What Does a Problem List of Typical Health IT Look Like, Part 2

At my Mar. 15, 2011 post "<a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/what-does-problem-list-of-typical.html">What does a "problem list" of typical health IT look like?</a>" I displayed a chart by Jon Patrick at U. Sydney on the ill-suited nature of an American EHR system for use in Emergency Dept. settings. That system had been mandated for rollout in public ED's in the entire Australian state of New South Wales.<br /><br />As it turns out, that chart was just preliminary.<br /><br />A new chart is up entitled "Analysis of Problems Defined by ED Directors", divided into four sections:<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span><blockquote>1. Workarounds and Abandonments<span style="font-weight: bold;"> (27 elements)<br /></span>2. Functions Lost from the Pre-FirstNet System or Desirable Functions <span style="font-weight: bold;">(31 elements)<br /></span>3. Processes with Added Risk to the Integrity of the EMR<span style="font-weight: bold;"> (11 elements)<br /></span>4. General Problem List - What is the Potential for Resolution? <span style="font-weight: bold;">(60 elements)</span></blockquote><br /><br />The entire chart can be viewed at this link (best with browsers other than MS Internet Explorer): <a href="http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/it/%7Ehitru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=120&Itemid=116">http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/it/~hitru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=120&Itemid=116</a> .<br /><br />It is lengthy, detailed and - stunning.<br /><br />Prof. Patrick concludes (emphases mine):<br /><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"></p><blockquote><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal">Reviewing this compendium of difficulties and obstacles created for staff makes it entirely unsurprising that the patient throughput of most EDs dropped by 50% on the day FirstNet was introduced and now <span style="font-weight: bold;">some years later throughputs are only just beginning to recover as staff have been able to instigate work practices to minimise the worst aspects of the system. <span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><br /></span></span></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[A spectacular waste of clinician energy - ed</span></span><span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">.] </span><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal">The workarounds and abandonments give an expression of the frustration of staff and their strategy for retaining equilibrium in their work practices despite FirstNet's presence. In a number of cases we have <span style="font-weight: bold;">seen the practice guidelines of NSWHealth surrendered by the imperatives of the technology</span> with the imposition of the HSS. It is astounding that <span style="font-weight: bold;">practices defined from years of clinical experience can be discarded so whimsically.</span> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><br /></span></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[As I have written, the IT industry has invaded the healthcare sector, and this is the absolutely non-whimsical result - ed.]</span><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal">Fortunately, in the case of one pathology laboratory, patient safety was put ahead of the technological imperative lest it jeopardise the registration of the laboratory. The described function-losses with FirstNet compared to the pre-FirstNet systems, and the functionality needs expressed by the staff indicate that they are acutely aware of the value of good technology and have a strong desire to be equipped with something that works properly without creating unacceptable risks to patients and a draconian reduction in their efficiency. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The risks posed by the system to maintaining the integrity of the medical record is something that staff are acutely concerned about as they feel it fails to fulfil their legal obligations.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Emergency Departments are too important to have to endure these stressful and unproductive conditions.</span><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[This is a first principle, as as such is not open to debate - ed.]</span><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold;">It is time that the knowledge and experience of the Directors and their staff were listened to and taken seriously</span> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[actually, six decades or so into the "computer revolution", I'd say that time was long ago - ed.]</span> for the sake of improving our hospitals's use of technology. After all we have to ask: <span style="font-weight: bold;">What business would commit to an interloping "integrated" system whose services are being necessarily dismembered piecemeal as a matter of survival by the users? </span>This is a system whose pieces are not used by the staff, but rather are shadow mirrored by them, not for redundancy but primacy.<br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Who would want a system that is progressively de-activated by the staff to overcome the hazards and operational inefficiencies it has introduced? </span><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 11pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">[My answer: those who profit handsomely, and at no liability to themselves, from this arrangement. I leave it to the reader to decide who might fit in that category - ed.]</span><br /></p></blockquote><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">As a physician and medical informatics specialist myself, I would not want my ED care or that of my family interfered with by such IT.</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br /><br />Several questions:<br /><br /><ul><li>How did a government for an<span style="font-weight: bold;"> entire state of a major country</span> come to allow themselves to believe an EHR system such as this would improve conditions in the most mission critical section of their hospitals, the ED's?</li></ul><ul><li>What testing and validation of the software was done by officials and representatives of said government, and who were they, exactly?</li></ul><ul><li>What experience and background did the validators possess?</li></ul><ul><li>How were clinician complaints during implementation, which has apparently been underway for several years now, handled?</li></ul><ul><li>What other countries are going down the same path?</li></ul><ul><li>Why is not all health IT subject to the same type of <span style="font-weight: bold;">government regulator-led validation</span> as this system was put under by a private academic researcher? (Note that the U.S., pharma IT validation is led by the FDA, but that same agency has essentially shied away from healthcare IT validation.)<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Would a country buy software as ill suited to purpose for, say, mitigating disaster risk in their nuclear power facilities?<br /></li></ul><br />Finally, I ask:<br /><br />If the purpose of Medical Informatics is the <span style="font-style: italic;">improvement of healthcare</span> (as opposed to career advancement of a small number of academics through publishing obscure articles about HIT benefits while ignoring downsides in rarified, echo-chamber peer reviewed journals), then:<br /><br /><ul><li>Who are the <span style="font-weight: bold;">"real" medical informatics specialists</span>, and;<br /></li></ul><ul><li>Who are the <span style="font-weight: bold;">poseurs</span>?</li></ul><br />I opine that researchers like Jon Patrick who address real-world issues of great import to patients on HIT risks, and further go public on the web with their work without the full blessings of some dusty journal (and those like Ross Koppel who also directly address the downsides, and others who make available to the public material such as on blogs like <a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/">this</a> and <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/">this</a>, papers <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/28747771/Remediating-an-Unintended-Consequence-of-Healthcare-IT-A-Dearth-of-Data-on-Unintended-Consequences-of-Healthcare-IT">like this</a> and sites <a href="http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/ssilverstein/cases/">like this</a>) are the <span style="font-style: italic;">former</span>.<br /><br />Those who deem only "peer reviewed" articles worthy of daylight, and everything else - <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">especially</span> <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">and particularly </span>reports of downsides - "anecdotal" (the <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/09/dangers-of-critical-thinking-in.html">anecdotalists</a>) are the <span style="font-style: italic;">latter</span>.<br /><br />-- SS

"Real" Medical Informatics: What Does a Problem List of Typical Health IT Look Like, Part 2

At my Mar. 15, 2011 post " What does a "problem list" of typical health IT look like? " I displayed a chart by Jon Patr...

Đọc thêm »

Conflicts of Interest, Government Leaders, and Private Health Care Organizations

There seems to be a small surge of stories about conflicts of interest regarding health care affecting government leaders who can affect health care.  <br /><br />The Institute of Medicine defined conflict of interest in medicine as "circumstances that create a risk that professional judgments or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest."  So we will summarize these stories by first showing what each leader's secondary interests are, and then show how they may influence carrying out his leadership responsibilities.  (We used "his" because all examples are of male leaders.)<br /><br /><strong>Florida: Governor Scott and Solantic</strong><br /><br />Rick Scott, the new Florida Governor, apparently still has strong ties to a for-profit chain of urgent care centers, as <a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/gov-scott-shifting-clinics-to-his-wife-raises-1317326.html">reported</a> by the Palm Beach Post:<br /><blockquote>As Florida Gov. Rick Scott reorganizes health agencies, cuts spending and pushes for new free-market health policies,<em> his ownership of Solantic, the urgent care chain, increasingly poses conflict of interest questions.</em><br /><br />Solantic co-founder Karen Bowling says Scott has taken steps to distance himself from the chain. He stopped regular business calls with her after he was elected.<br /><br />'I don't talk to him anymore. Not since November. Really not much since April,' Bowling said.<br /><br />Scott left the privately held company's board of directors in January 2010, during his campaign.<br /><br />But the most important step the governor must take to avoid a conflict of interest, some ethics experts say, is to divest his Solantic interests.<br /><br />In January, <em>Scott did transfer his Solantic stock - to his wife</em>.</blockquote><br />There were obvious questions raised whether this transfer mitigated the conflict of interest:<br /><blockquote>Scott's efforts to distance himself appear to be designed to meet the letter of Florida ethics laws, if not the spirit.<br /><br />They may not succeed if challenged, warned legal and ethics expert Marc Rodwin, a law professor at Suffolk University who is the author of several books on health care and conflicts of interest.<br /><br /><em>'Placing his ownership in the name of his wife is not an effective way to control for conflicts of interest and not generally accepted because they are personally related,' Rodwin said.</em><br /><em><br /></em><br /><em>Rodwin said Scott's blindness to Solantic's daily business decisions likewise does not relieve his conflict.</em><br /><em><br /></em><br /><em>'His family still benefits from it,</em>' he said.</blockquote><br />There are a number of issues before Florida government about which there appears to be a risk that Governor Scott's actions could be unduly influenced by his family's ownership interest in Solantic:<br /><blockquote>From the moment he was elected, <em>Scott has said government has no business providing primary care.</em><br /><em><br /></em><br /><em>His budget proposal eliminated state support for the clinics. The county's health department director warns that may leave 30,000 adults without a medical home</em>.<br /><br />Scott's decisions as governor are likely to affect Solantic in other, perhaps more significant ways.<br /><br />Scott's budget would <em>curb growth in Medicaid spending, the state-federal safety net insurance program, by requiring most recipients to join private HMOs. Solantic accepts Medicaid HMO reimbursements, but not state Medicaid, so adding clients could broaden the clinics' customer base.</em><br /><br />But the greatest benefit for Solantic could come from Scott and other Republican governors' lobbying efforts in Washington.<br /><br />They want the Obama administration to give states waivers from the Affordable Care Act, and provide them with a massive block grant to expand health coverage in the way they deem best for their states. Money slated to go to business' health insurance tax credits and lower income consumers' insurance subsidies could pay for the grants - to the tune of billions.<br /><br />Obama has said he's willing to give the states waivers on a speeded-up timetable. His administration Thursday published new rules on how states could get that waiver.<br /><br />Scott's health policy adviser Michael Cannon, an economist with the Cato Institute in Washington, favors giving consumers health vouchers that they would use either as cash for direct-pay medical care or to buy insurance.<br /><br />The possible effect on Solantic and similar clinics could be huge, said Rodwin, the legal ethics expert.<br /><br /><em>'You have a major owner-operator of a set of clinics on the state level, and a major policy figure on a state level, making major changes that affect whether that kind of business will thrive or not, what their competition will be, and really reforming the whole health sector,'  Rodwin said. That's in my view a very dangerous role</em>.'</blockquote><br />Note that this is not the first whiff of scandal regarding Rick Scott's leadership role in health care.  As the article noted, Scott:<br /><blockquote>resigned as CEO of <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/HCA">Columbia/HCA</a> amid a federal billing fraud investigation. Columbia/HCA ultimately agreed to the <em>nation's largest Medicare fraud settlement, a $1.7 billion criminal and civil penalty.</em><br /><br />Although the company had admitted to criminal wrongdoing, Scott himself was never charged, and he has denied knowledge of the illegal activities.<br /><br />Scott left Columbia/HCA with more than $5 million in severance and $300 million worth of stock and options.</blockquote>See our most recent detailed post on Mr Scott's history <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/05/how-did-ceo-who-presided-over-company.html">here</a>.<br /><br /><strong>Massachusetts: House Health Finance Committee Chair Walsh and Health Care Industry Lobbyists</strong><br /><br />The newly appointed chair of the Massachusetts House committee on health care finance has strong relationships to health care industry lobbyists, according to <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/02/23/with_family_ties_to_lobbyists_walsh_doesnt_fit_health_post/">an editorial </a>in the Boston Globe:<br /><blockquote>Speaker Robert DeLeo has chosen a health-finance committee chairman, Steven M. Walsh of Lynn, <em>whose family is to lobbying what the Mannings are to NFL quarterbacking. Walsh’s father-in-law represents the state’s health insurers, while his uncle’s firm blocks and tackles for <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/Steward%20Health%20Care">Steward Health Care</a></em>, new owners of the Caritas chain of Catholic hospitals. </blockquote><br />Again, there are a number of issues before the Massachusetts legislature about which there appears to be a risk that Representative Walsh's actions could be unduly influenced by his family's lobbying work:<br /><blockquote>Next to the budget, the thorniest issue the Legislature will deal with this year will be changes in health care financing. <em>Lawmakers will consider bills that may completely change how health care providers are paid. That shift — from fee-for-service payments towards a system based more on per-capita reimbursements — will set off a free-for-all among insurers, doctors, and hospitals.</em></blockquote><br />So,<br /><blockquote>Walsh’s admirable efforts ... [to improve legistlation regarding lobbying] don’t erase the conflict of interest he faces on health care issues. Walsh can try to separate family feelings and events from his official role, but the companies paying his uncle’s firm and his father-in-law are still expecting them to use every opportunity to make the strongest possible case for their clients. And <em>it’s no exaggeration that these clients — the state’s insurers and its newest hospital chain — have hundreds of millions of dollars at risk in the new payment system Walsh will be vetting</em>.<br /><br />Perhaps if the stakes were lower or the relationships more distant, Walsh could chair the health-finance committee without risking public confidence. But as it is, he will be in a position of representing the taxpayers’ interests against those of his close relatives.</blockquote>Note that we discussed Steward Health's possibly revolutionary role in commercializing physicians' practices <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/02/send-mercenaries-guns-and-money.html">here</a>, and how a former Massachusetts government health care agency official exited via the revolving door to join Steward Health Care <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2011/03/those-big-doors-keep-revolving.html">here</a>. <br /><strong>New York: Governor Cuomo's Advisor and Major Hospital Systems</strong><br /><br />New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has a close advisor whom he just appointed to a "Medicaid redesign team" whose clients include large academic medical centers/ hospital systems, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/nyregion/23cuomo.html">per</a> the New York Times:<br /><blockquote>When Andrew M. Cuomo married Kerry Kennedy in 1990, Jeffrey A. Sachs served as an usher. When Mr. Cuomo’s daughter Michaela was born, he asked Mr. Sachs to be her godfather. When his marriage fell apart years later, Mr. Cuomo stayed in Mr. Sachs’s triplex near the United Nations. <br /><br />Since Mr. Cuomo’s election as governor last fall, <em>Mr. Sachs, 58, has taken on a powerful role among his health care advisers as the administration confronts crucial decisions, including how to overhaul New York’s $53 billion Medicaid program.</em> <br /><br />But at the same time, Mr. Sachs, known to many in Albany as 'Andrew’s best friend,' is <em>working as a paid consultant to some of the biggest players in the New York health care industry, including Mount Sinai Medical Center, NYU Langone Medical Center and the state’s largest association of nursing homes</em>, all of which have financial interests at stake in the coming Medicaid changes. <br /><br />Mr. Sachs, whose firm is named Sachs Consulting, has never registered as a lobbyist, which would require him to divulge his clients and fees to the state ethics commission. </blockquote><br />Again, there are a number of issues before New York government about which there appears to be a risk that Governor Cuomo's actions could be unduly influenced by his friend, advisor, and committee member's consulting relationships with major hospital systems. <br /><blockquote>Mr. Sachs was also an early advocate of the “Wisconsin model” of Medicaid, under which the governor would <em>set a target for spending reductions and then appoint a task force of industry stakeholders to apportion the cuts</em>. The approach has political appeal for the governor, in that it entices would-be opponents of spending reductions to participate in the plan rather than protest it. But it also <em>endows the unelected team members with immense power</em>. <br /><br />Mr. Sachs made <em>recommendations to Mr. Cuomo and his aides about whom to appoint to the Medicaid team</em>, which Mr. Cuomo formed through an executive order in January. During the transition, Mr. Sachs also <em>helped assemble a four-person policy team</em> to begin meeting with state agencies about the best approach to reducing Medicaid spending</blockquote><br />Moreover, the Times article recounted cases in which Mr Sachs appeared to influence policy in ways that benefited his consulting clients. For example:<br /><blockquote>While he was helping Mr. Cuomo assemble his health care staff, Mr. Sachs’s name arose in an unusual personnel matter, one that held great interest for one of his clients, NYU Langone Medical Center. <br /><br />For at least a year, NYU Langone had had strained relations with Dr. Harold S. Koplewicz, a well-known psychiatrist who founded the hospital’s child psychiatry center but left in 2009 to start a competing research and clinical center. <br /><br />Relations worsened because Dr. Koplewicz, who also served as director of the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, a state-run psychiatric center in Rockland County that also has a research affiliation with NYU, refused to allow NYU to screen those he hired at the institute, among other issues. <br /><br />During an October meeting between Mr. Sachs and Dr. Koplewicz, <em>Mr. Sachs suggested the doctor resign from the Kline Institute</em>, people briefed on the meeting said. <em>Should he lobby too aggressively to keep his job, Mr. Sachs warned, Mr. Cuomo, then widely expected to win election, might choose to close down the institute. </em><br /><br />In a later meeting in December, Michael F. Hogan, state commissioner of mental health, told Dr. Koplewicz that he had been <em>warned by Mr. Sachs that his reappointment by Mr. Cuomo would be jeopardized if Dr. Koplewicz did not resign</em>, according to the people briefed. <br /><br />Afterward, Dr. Koplewicz wrote Dr. Hogan a letter detailing his accomplishments as director of the institute and complaining of the pressure being exerted by Mr. Sachs. <br /><br />'As you explained — and I appreciate your candor — <em>you have been pressured by NYU through Jeff Sachs to have me resign as a condition</em> for your reappointment as commissioner of mental health,' Dr. Koplewicz wrote in the letter. <br /><br />In a response sent the following day, Dr. Hogan did not dispute Dr. Koplewicz’s account but suggested that he had been insufficiently cooperative with NYU and the Office of Mental Health. <br /><br />'Accordingly, your service as director, Psychiatric Research Institute, will end effective Jan. 13, 2011,' Dr. Hogan wrote. <br /><br />Dr. Koplewicz and Dr. Hogan both declined to comment, though neither disputed the authenticity of the letters. </blockquote><br />This case is particularly disquieting because of Governor Cuomo's former role as a tough state attorney general who targeted white collar crime.<br /><br /><strong>Summary</strong><br /><br />US health care is hugely complex. The interests of its increasingly large commercial players can be strongly affected by the actions of government at local, state and national levels. <br /><br />We have previously discussed the pervasiveness of conflicts of interest throughout health care. It should come as no surprise that there are important conflicts affecting government leaders who have power over health care issues. <br /><br />Although there may actually be more laws and regulations about conflicts of interest affecting government leaders than about those affecting, say, leaders of academic medical institutions, the increasingly incestuous nature of health care leadership seems to add impetus to entwine the system in ever increasing strands of conflict. <br /><br />So, I humbly suggest, as a variation on a theme I have sounded before, that governmental leaders who have power over health care should put the health of patients and the population first, and should not have relationships that risk this mission in service of private gain.  Furthermore, leaders of civilian health care organizations, especially of hospitals, hospital systems and physicians' groups whose mission is also to improve care of individuals and society, should not seek to entangle government leaders in conflicts meant to serve private financial interests. 

Conflicts of Interest, Government Leaders, and Private Health Care Organizations

There seems to be a small surge of stories about conflicts of interest regarding health care affecting government leaders who can affect hea...

Đọc thêm »

Health Care Executives' Compensation: Head's, They Win, Tail's, You Lose

It seems to be the season for stories about the pay of health care leaders to appear in the press. Here is our latest round-up.<br /><br /><strong>Novant Health</strong><br /><br />First the Winston-Salem (NC) Journal <a href="http://www2.journalnow.com/news/2011/mar/01/wsbiz01-executives-at-novant-health-receive-sizabl-ar-821953">reported</a> hefty pay received by executives of a regional hospital system:<br /><blockquote>Four of the top five executives at Novant Health Inc. received substantial salary increases during 2010, according to the health-care system.<br /><br />However, the overall compensation and benefits for the top three executives were down for the fiscal year.<br /><br /><em>Paul Wiles, the chief executive and president of the not-for-profit system, got a $129,000 raise, or 14 percent, to $1,029,000 in salary. He got a bonus of $836,800, up $9,338. His total compensation was down 3 percent to a little more than $2 million.</em></blockquote><br />Also,<br /><blockquote><em>Greg Beier, the president of Novant Health Operations, received a 15 percent salary increase to $659,000, but total compensation was down 8 percent to $1.48 million.</em><br /><br /><em>Carl Armato, the president of Novant Health Markets, got a 5 percent salary increase to $638,000, but total compensation decreased 3 percent to $1.26 million.</em><br /><br /><em>Jacque Gattis, the system's chief administrative officer, had a 19 percent salary increase to $490,000 and a 5 percent total compensation increase to $951,975.</em><br /><em><br /></em><br /><em>Stephen Wallenhaupt, its chief medical officer, received a 20 percent increase in salary to $481,000 and an 8 percent increase in total compensation to $935,525.</em></blockquote><br />This article made it seem that the substantial compensation received by these executives was related to the system's financial performance:<br /><blockquote>[Senior Vice President of marketing and communication Jim] Tobalski said Novant will release its fiscal 2010 financial report in April. The system <em>likely will report a better overall performance</em> because of the stock market's surge in 2010.</blockquote><br />However, as <a href="http://www2.journalnow.com/news/2011/mar/09/wsmain01-novant-exec-bonuses-irk-some-employees-de-ar-845654/">reported</a> eight days later again by the Winston-Salem (NC) Journal, there are other ways to look at these executives' compensation. First, their bonuses can be compared to those given less exalted employees:<br /><blockquote>Novant Health Inc. has paid two separate bonuses, including a one-time 'thank you' offering, to its Forsyth Medical Center employees recently, but that has not dampened the complaints of some employees that executive payments were too high.<br /><br />Jeff Lindsay, the hospital's president, notified employees of the bonuses in an internal memo Feb. 28.<br /><br />Lindsay's memo said the thank-you bonus was for 'efforts above and beyond the achievement of our 2010 goals.' <em>It was worth $120 for employees who worked more than 1,500 paid hours in 2010 and $60 for those who worked 750 to 1,499 paid hours</em>.<br /><br /><em>Novant also paid a 'discretionary' bonus ranging from $120 to $300</em>, depending on the employee's length of service and employment status. That bonus was contingent on Novant achieving goals in quality, financial vitality, employee commitment and patient satisfaction.<br /><br />By comparison, the top five executives of Novant received a combined $2.62 million in executive bonuses for 2010. The combined bonuses were up $151,713 from 2009.</blockquote><br />Furthermore, it is not clear that the system's financial performance has been as good as its spokesman implied above:<br /><blockquote>Several Forsyth Medical employees criticized Novant's decision to pay the executive bonuses after <em>the hospital cited financial challenges and lower demand for services in cutting 48 jobs there in July.</em><br /><br />'How can any executive with a conscience accept a $129,000 raise and an $836,800 bonus while the company lays off employees who desperately need income to support their families?' said one posting to JournalNow.com.</blockquote><br />So, in summary, some useful comparisons are: top executives' bonuses were approximately one-thousand times the size of those given to regular employees; and top executives' total compensation was justifed by "financial performance" during a year the system had to lay off workers due to "financial challenges."<br /><br /><strong>University of Massachusetts Medical Center</strong><br /><br />The Worcester (MA) Telegram <a href="http://www.telegram.com/article/20110316/NEWS/103160420/1116">reported</a> on the leader's compensation contrasted with the hospital's financial status:<br /><blockquote><em>While facing a $54 million budget shortfall for next fiscal year, the University of Massachusetts last month hiked UMass Medical School Chancellor Michael F. Collins’ salary by more than $60,000 a year — almost a 12 percent pay raise.</em><br /><br />The three-year contract signed by Dr. Collins and outgoing University of Massachusetts President Jack Wilson on Feb. 14 raises the medical school chancellor’s annual base salary and deferred compensation from $524,300 to $585,290.<br /><br />Under the deal, Dr. Collins will no longer get a separate $32,000-a-year housing allowance and instead is required to live rent-free in the furnished and remodeled Grenon House on Flagg Street. The five-bedroom, four-bathroom home has an assessed value of $736,600 and is owned by the University of Massachusetts Foundation, according to city property records. </blockquote><br />Dr Collins' total compensation, however, will be considerably larger than his salary:<br /><blockquote>Dr. Collins, who also serves as the university’s senior vice president for health sciences, will continue to be eligible for additional performance pay of up to 30 percent of his base salary a year, which works out to $164,100 in potential performance pay in the new contract, up from $147,000 under his previous salary.<br /><br />The chancellor also will continue to receive $15,000 a year for his choice of life insurance or an extended care health insurance policy, as well as supplemental retirement contributions totaling $98,000 a year — the IRS maximum for those type of retirement accounts, according to the contract and the medical school.<br /><br />All together, <em>the chancellor’s compensation package and benefits could be worth as much as $862,000 a year if he receives the maximum performance pay</em>. That figure does not include the value of living at Grenon House. </blockquote><br />His raise can be contrasted with those received by lower-level employees:<br /><blockquote>The chancellor’s pay hike stands in contrast to <em>2 percent raises negotiated late last year with some union workers at the medical school and with a previous salary freeze for all university employees earning $120,000 a year or more.</em><br /><br />In announcing that pay freeze two years ago, Mr. Wilson noted, 'We are living at a time when few people are seeing their financial circumstances improve and most are happy to preserve what they have as we ride out the current fiscal and economic storm.' </blockquote><br />Despite the budget short-fall, and consequent salary freezes, the criterion for the Chancellor's salary seemed to be what other top executives were getting at other organizations, even if those organizations were having better financial results:<br /><blockquote>'The university does try to<em> set salaries for senior administrators in relation to what people are paid for discharging comparable duties at comparable institutions</em>,' [university spokesman] Mr. Connolly said. 'In this case, Chancellor Collins would be slightly under the median salary paid at comparable institutions.' </blockquote>Another university spokesman justified the Chancellor's compensation by citing his performance:<br /><blockquote>'The chancellor has a record of success in Worcester,' said [university spokesman] Mr. Keohane, who provided an eight-page medical school report titled 'Accomplishments of Michael F. Collins, MD.'<br /><br />The report lists dozens of improvements to the medical school during the tenure of Dr. Collins, including items such as: leading the campaign to make the university a partner in the state’s $1 billion life sciences initiative; increasing medical school class enrollments by 25 percent; presiding over improving academic performance; growing revenue by more than 27 percent; instituting more formal performance reviews among executive staff; and improving collaboration with UMass Memorial Health Care Inc. </blockquote><br />Oddly enough, he did not mention UMass Memorial's aggressive recruiting campaign for bone marrow donors in part implemented by "flirtatious models" that failed to disclose how the donors would be charged for their generosity as one of the Chancellor's achievements related to "improving collaboration" with UMass Memorial (see <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/12/high-heels-short-skirts-and-recruiting.html">this post</a>). <br /><br />So, in summary, a budget shortfall was the justification for freezing line employees' pay, but not the Chancellor's pay, which was raised.  One rationale for the raise was that the Chancellor's pay had to be increased to keep up with pay of executives elsewhere, but the pay of line employees was not compared with such employees elsewhere.  Another rationale for the raise was a list of positive developments at the medical center, but negative developments were ignored, as were the contributions of any employees other than the Chancellor to the positive developments.<br /><br /><strong>Summary: Head's, They Win, Tail's, You Lose </strong><br /><br />Juxtaposing these two examples shows how justifications for executive compensation in health care often seem to be ad hoc, after the fact, and inconsistent with any rationale for compensation for more mundane employees.  If outcomes have been good lately, then the good outcomes may be the rationale for better executive compensation.  If the outcomes have been bad, then the executives must deserve more because they are struggling so hard under tough conditions.  <br /><br />The rules for everyone else, of course, seem to be more stark.  <br /><br />So, once more with feeling, as we have <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/executive%20compensation">said before</a>, far too often the leaders of not-for-profit health care institutions seem more interested in padding their own bottom lines than upholding the institutions' missions. They often seem entirely unaware of their duty to put those missions ahead of their own self-interest. Like the financial services sector in the era of "greed is good," health care too often seems run by <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2009/12/compensation-madness-insiders-hijacking.html">"<strong><em>insiders hijacking established institutions for their personal benefit.</em></strong>"</a> True health care reform would encourage leadership of health care who understand health care and care about its mission, rather than those who see a quick way to make a small fortune.

Health Care Executives' Compensation: Head's, They Win, Tail's, You Lose

It seems to be the season for stories about the pay of health care leaders to appear in the press. Here is our latest round-up. Novant Healt...

Đọc thêm »

Medical Data Breach of the Month Department: Health Net Once Again a Star in the Healthcare Renewal Theatre

I have written frequently about the breaches of electronic information security, such as at my posts:<br /><blockquote><br />"<a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/02/networked-emrs-and-healthcare.html">Networked EMR's and Healthcare Information Security: Practical When Massive IT Security Breaches Continue</a>?"<br /><br />"<a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/02/networked-interoperable-secure-national.html">Networked, Interoperable, Secure National Medical Records a Castle in the Sky?</a>"<br /><br />"<a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/01/it-flaws-and-coverups-of-same-why-i.html">Operation Aurora And a Widespread Reluctance to Discuss IT Flaws: Is Universal Healthcare IT Really a Good Idea in 2010?</a>"<br /><br /><a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2010/10/medical-data-breach-of-week-but-your.html">Medical data breach of the week - but your EMR data is secure, trust us, we're IT experts</a> </blockquote><br />and <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/medical%20record%20privacy">others</a>.<br /><br />This latest medical information breach only affected a mere 2 million people this time.<br /><br />Perhaps we should go for 20 million next time?<br /><br />And then - there were substantial delays in notification (to give identity thieves time to get rich?)<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/Health-Net-Delays-Notification-of-Data-Breach-Involving-2-Million-People-830137/"></a><blockquote><span style="font-size:130%;"><a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Health-Care-IT/Health-Net-Delays-Notification-of-Data-Breach-Involving-2-Million-People-830137/">Health Net Delays Notification of Data Breach Involving 2 Million People</a></span><br /><br />By: Brian T. Horowitz<br />2011-03-16<br /><br />Insurer Health Net waited until March 14 to disclose a data breach discovered on Jan. 21 involving the loss of nine server drives and the data of 2 million customers, employees and health care providers.<br /><br />Health Net, a provider of health insurance to about 6 million people across the United States, has come under fire for reporting the loss of nine server drives at its data center in Rancho Cordova, Calif., nearly two months after it occurred.<br /><br />More than 2 million Health Net members, employees and health care providers may have been affected by the data breach, including about 845,000 California policyholders, according to The San Francisco Chronicle. California regulators are investigating the breach, the newspaper reports. </blockquote><br />How did this happen?<br /><br /><blockquote>The insurer found out about the security lapse on Jan. 21, when IBM, which manages the company's IT infrastructure,<span style="font-weight: bold;"> informed Health Net that it was unable to locate server drives</span>, according to a recording on Health Net's data breach hotline (855-434-8081).</blockquote><br />These drives perhaps are of a new technology, with motorized robotic legs that allow them to walk away.<br /><br />Or perhaps the drives were like this, where the round drive platter stacks perform double duty as wheels:<br /><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrqfz2H4v-4ETZab1YQ_pMxAuYJmoss3TKM_4eO7IjmEVyGDcpVOyR7U6MCfqmBAwDwQE8unf7WI7HDUKVwZapo8G_oyT6xzZqPcnmYxP3a836CEjkhE2UPwKYgs0bRWDpd6CV7yMYaehF/s1600/hard_drive_platter_bike_2.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5585148031017789426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrqfz2H4v-4ETZab1YQ_pMxAuYJmoss3TKM_4eO7IjmEVyGDcpVOyR7U6MCfqmBAwDwQE8unf7WI7HDUKVwZapo8G_oyT6xzZqPcnmYxP3a836CEjkhE2UPwKYgs0bRWDpd6CV7yMYaehF/s320/hard_drive_platter_bike_2.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 240px;" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;"></span><span style="font-size:85%;">A "mobile" hard drive. Click to enlarge.</span><br /></div><br /><br />The drives just rolled away - to the tune of Steppenwolf's "<span style="font-weight: bold;">Born to be Wild</span>" ...<br /><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMbATaj7Il8"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5585151587729552738" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjcfj8OtLaCfr3LZXkP4FEC-vDFChrOQJKfnWKWbuSnJg-rZd3Js8f-qrm_UJpdBAJ0KZob6Ry_iVAcv8161Ip1F7yJqjYSzM75F4NySHR2Xhcqdf4NB08VBW748DUiMymg-Rh8Em29ha54/s320/easyrider.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 231px;" /></a><span style="font-size:85%;">These drives were just Born to be Wild! Click to play.</span><br /></div><br /><br />Get your motor runnin' ... head out on the highway ...<br /><blockquote><br />The health benefits provider began its investigation at that time and learned that the nine drives included personal information for former and current Health Net members, employees and health care providers. <span style="font-weight: bold;">The company didn't report the breach to the public until March 14.</span></blockquote><br />Gee, thanks.<br /><br /><blockquote>Health Net spokesman Brad Kieffer declined eWEEK's request for additional information on the breach but said, "We continue investigating unaccounted for server drives, and out of an abundance of caution we are notifying our members."<br /></blockquote><br />"Abundance of caution" and an almost 2-month delay do not belong in the same news story.<br /><blockquote><br />... "Given the size and type of data lost, this is a serious breach, and those affected should have been notified and protected immediately when IBM notified Health Net of the loss," Rob Enderle, principal analyst for the Enderle Group, wrote in an e-mail to eWEEK.</blockquote><br />Indeed.<br /><blockquote><br />"While the delay was likely due to the belief that these drives were either misplaced or reused and not logged and the hope they would turn up on a maintenance rotation, the exposure to those that may have been compromised is excessive, and for an insurance company not to immediately mitigate this exposure—unforgivable," Enderle said.</blockquote><br />"Hope/keeping your fingers crossed" and "due diligence/corporate responsibility" also do not belong in the same paragraph.<br /><br /><blockquote>Information included names, addresses, health information, Social Security numbers and/or financial information, Health Net reports. .</blockquote><br />All the news that's fit to print.<br /><br /><blockquote><br />The Health Net breach could be the<span style="font-weight: bold;"> most serious health care data breach since 2008, </span>when incidents affected 2.2 million people at the University of Utah and 2.1 million people at the University of Miami, according to the San Francisco Chronicle report.</blockquote><br />Since 2008, eh, way back when, ancient history, when dinosaurs ruled the earth?<br /><br /><blockquote>In May 2009, Health Net suffered another security breach in which a portable disk drive holding the medical and financial data on 1.5 million members disappeared from its Connecticut headquarters.</blockquote><br />The portable disk drives must have robotic legs, too.<br /><blockquote><br />Data breach penalties for Health Net could be severe, according to Enderle.<br /><br /></blockquote>Perhaps that's why they were crossing their fingers hoping the drives would turn up somehow?<br /><br />Finally, I note that this company has also been busy in recent years making a name for themselves in the Healthcare Renewal Theatre in other ways. They're stars! See <a href="http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/Health%20Net" target="_blank">http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/search/label/Health%20Net</a><br /><br />-- SS

Medical Data Breach of the Month Department: Health Net Once Again a Star in the Healthcare Renewal Theatre

I have written frequently about the breaches of electronic information security, such as at my posts: " Networked EMR's and Healthc...

Đọc thêm »